Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWB vs SCHF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to SCHF's +17.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWB and SCHF
Net assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $69.7bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab International Equity ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHF costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.5 points.
| Measure | IWB | SCHF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.1% | +17.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.4%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | FTSE Developed ex US Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, IWB as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHF as of Aug 31, 2026 | $49.1bn | $69.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.3% | 13.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and SCHF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWB and SCHF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
SCHF
SCHF tracks an index of International Equity. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +12.1% for its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,475 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or SCHF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and SCHF +17.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or SCHF?
- SCHF is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against SCHF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-schf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWB against SCHF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-schf
[IWB against SCHF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-schf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.