Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWB vs IWD: how they differ
IWB and IWD hold 61% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and IWD hold 61% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWB | IWD |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE | 6.73% | 5.83% |
| MICROSOFT | 5.21% | 4.93% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 3.49% | 6.04% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B | 1.35% | 2.54% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 1.35% | 2.54% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 0.98% | 1.85% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 0.92% | 1.73% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A | 2.02% | 0.69% |
| WALMART INC | 0.66% | 1.14% |
| INTEL CORPORATION | 0.65% | 1.23% |
| ABBVIE | 0.64% | 1.12% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 0.61% | 1.14% |
| Only in IWB | Only in IWD |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 7.26% | CASH COLLATERAL MSFUT USD 0.02% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77% | AMENTUM HOLDINGS 0.01% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.40% | ASSURED GUARANTY LTD 0.01% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24% | BATH AND BODY WORKS 0.01% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.57% | BOK FINANCIAL CORP 0.01% |
| TESLA INC 1.52% | BRIGHT HORIZONS FAMILY SOLUTIONS 0.01% |
| ELI LILLY 1.28% | BRIGHTHOUSE FINANCIAL 0.01% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.17% | CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP 0.01% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Russell 1000 | Russell 1000 value |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.7% | +27.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.8 pts | +9.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.9% | 90.2% |
| Holdings | 945 | 814 |
IWB in plain words
IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 814 positions, with the top ten at 29.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or IWD?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and IWD returned +27.4%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or IWD?
- IWB charges 0.15% a year and IWD charges 0.18%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWB and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 61% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against IWD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-iwd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources