Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IVV vs NBOS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IVV returned +13.7% to NBOS's +14.7%, and IVV charges 0.03% to NBOS's 0.57%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IVV and NBOS

Net assets: $885.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, and $532m on Aug 31, 2026 for Neuberger Option Strategy ETF.

At a glance
+13.7%
IVV total return, 1 year
+14.7%
NBOS total return, 1 year
0.03%
IVV expense ratio
0.57%
NBOS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point.

IVV vs NBOS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIVVNBOS
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.7%+14.7%
Price change, 1 yearrose 12.4%rose 5.4%
Latest payout, annualized9.0%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500Benchmark: S&P 500, measured through SPY
Against its benchmark, same daysahead by 1.1 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.57%
Net assets, IVV as of Oct 27, 2026 and NBOS as of Aug 31, 2026$885.1bn$532m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 9, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 141 weekly returns · each against SPY
IVV NBOS
Return
Total return edge IVV +56.9% +37.9%
Annualized edge IVV +18.1% +12.6%
Price return edge IVV +51.5% +11.1%
Risk
Volatility edge NBOS 14.4% 8.3%
Max drawdown edge NBOS −16.9% −11.2%
Downside capture 100.4% 52.0%
Beta 1.01 0.53
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge NBOS (slight) 0.92 0.95
Sortino edge IVV 1.42 1.27
Treynor 0.132 0.148
Calmar edge NBOS (slight) 1.07 1.13
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.03 0.41
Information ratio 0.21 −0.72
Tracking error 0.4% 7.5%
Reading

IVV returned more: +56.9% to +37.9%. NBOS swung less: 8.3% to 14.4%. NBOS fell less at its worst: −11.2% to −16.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IVV vs NBOS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIVVNBOSSPYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+56.9%+37.9%IVVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.1%+12.6%IVVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+51.5%+11.1%IVVPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.4%8.3%NBOSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.4%6.2%NBOSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−16.9%−11.2%NBOSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.8%42.9%100.0%IVVShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.4%52.0%100.0%NBOSShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.010.531.00NBOS lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.841.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.920.95NBOS (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.421.27IVVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1320.1480.132NBOSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.071.13NBOS (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYSPYSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year+0.8% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.030.41Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.4%−3.2% to +4.9%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.21−0.72IVVReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.4%7.5%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 141 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and NBOS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IVV NBOS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IVV
NVIDIA 7.92%
APPLE 7.61%
MICROSOFT 5.93%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.73%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.83%
BROADCOM INC 2.45%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.26%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.05%
Only in NBOS
United States Treasury 13.43%
United States Treasury 13.12%
United States Treasury 11.81%
United States Treasury 11.65%
United States Treasury 11.35%
United States Treasury 11.16%
United States Treasury 10.39%
United States Treasury 10.08%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF NBOS Neuberger Option Strategy ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Income ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 option income, vs SPY
Total return, 1 year +13.7% +14.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (SPY) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SPY +1.1 pts vs SPY
Cash paid, 1 year not an income fund 8.6%
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.57%
Holdings 505 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, IVV as of Oct 27, 2026 and NBOS as of Aug 31, 2026 $885.1bn $532m

IVV and NBOS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-AE0D5B344F

IVV and NBOS do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IVV follows S&P 500 and NBOS is measured against S&P 500 through SPY.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. Cost. IVV charges 0.03% of assets a year and NBOS 0.57%, a gap of 0.54 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IVV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

NBOS

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NBOS paid 8.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +13.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.1 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.0%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Are IVV and NBOS in the same category?
IVV is a stock ETF and NBOS is an option-income ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, IVV or NBOS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +13.7% and NBOS +14.7%.
Which is cheaper, IVV or NBOS?
IVV is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IVV against NBOS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-nbos

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.