Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IVV vs MMAX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IVV returned +13.7% to MMAX's +6.5%, and IVV charges 0.03% to MMAX's 0.50%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IVV and MMAX

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $885.1bn for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and $74m for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF.

At a glance
+13.7%
IVV total return, 1 year
+6.5%
MMAX total return, 1 year
0.03%
IVV expense ratio
0.50%
MMAX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.2 points; IVV is far larger, $885.1bn against $74m.

IVV vs MMAX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIVVMMAX
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.7%+6.5%
Drawdown
Index fall to the buffer15.9%
Fund price fall to the buffer4.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500IVV
The outcome period
Buffer left, in index points99.5% of 99.5%
Days left in the period155
Period endsMar 31, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.50%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$885.1bn$74m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.1%

Method

Side by side

IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Buffer ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Defined outcome, 0% to 100% on IVV
Total return, 1 year +13.7% +6.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (SPY) +12.4% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SPY −5.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.50%
Holdings 505 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $885.1bn $74m

IVV and MMAX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IVV and MMAX flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

MMAX

The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.5% as the period runs out.

IVV had already risen past this fund's cap of +6.5% for the period on Oct 27, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's price can fall 4.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, IVV can fall 15.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 99.5% of the 99.5% buffer still sits below today's IVV level. 155 days remained on Oct 27, 2026. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Are IVV and MMAX in the same category?
IVV is a stock ETF and MMAX is a buffer ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, IVV or MMAX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +13.7% and MMAX +6.5%.
Which is cheaper, IVV or MMAX?
IVV is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IVV against MMAX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-mmax

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.