Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IUSB vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IUSB returned −1.2% to IWM's +14.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IUSB and IWM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $49.8bn for iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF and $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
−1.2%
IUSB total return, 1 year
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
0.06%
IUSB expense ratio
0.19%
IWM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IUSB costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.3 points; IWM is 1.5 times larger.

IUSB vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIUSBIWM
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.2%+14.1%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Universal IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.06%0.19%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$49.8bn$75.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IUSB and IWM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IUSB IWM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IUSB
BLK Liquidity Temp Cash Inst #21 4.75%
TREASURY NOTE 0.49%
TREASURY NOTE 0.42%
TREASURY NOTE 0.41%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
TREASURY NOTE 0.37%
TREASURY NOTE (2OLD) 0.36%
UMBS 15YR TBA(REG B) 0.35%
Only in IWM
JFROG 0.37%
GLAUKOS 0.35%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%
UMB FINANCIAL 0.33%
SM ENERGY 0.32%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Universal USD Bond Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year −1.2% +14.1%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.3% (VTWO)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.2 pts vs VTWO
Expense ratio 0.06% 0.19%
Holdings 18338 1977
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $49.8bn $75.5bn

IUSB and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IUSB and IWM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IUSB

IUSB tracks an index of Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IUSB or IWM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IUSB returned −1.2% and IWM +14.1%.
Which is cheaper, IUSB or IWM?
IUSB is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IUSB against IWM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iusb-vs-iwm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.