Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ISMF vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ISMF returned +10.9% to TLT's −4.8%, and TLT charges 0.15% to ISMF's 0.80%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ISMF and TLT

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $37m for iShares Managed Futures Active ETF and $48.3bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+10.9%
ISMF total return, 1 year
−4.8%
TLT total return, 1 year
0.80%
ISMF expense ratio
0.15%
TLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.65 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.7 points; TLT is far larger, $48.3bn against $37m.

ISMF vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureISMFTLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+10.9%−4.8%
Total return, 52 weeks+10.5%
Drawdown
Below its high41.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Against its benchmark
What it tracksnot publishedICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash6.8 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.80%0.15%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$37m$48.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.48
Beta to the S&P 500+0.31: about 0.31% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.38%
Down-week capture35.9%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

ISMF iShares Managed Futures Active ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Alternatives ETF Bond ETF
What it is Managed futures Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year +10.9% −4.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −4.7% (BBLB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs BBLB
Expense ratio 0.80% 0.15%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 47
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $37m $48.3bn

ISMF and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

ISMF and TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ISMF

ISMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.48 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.31, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.31% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks ISMF fell 0.38% on average, a down-week capture of 35.9%. Over the same 52 weeks ISMF returned +10.5% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 6.8 percentage points ahead of cash.

TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against −4.7% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 41.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Nov 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are ISMF and TLT in the same category?
ISMF is an alternatives ETF and TLT is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, ISMF or TLT?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ISMF returned +10.9% and TLT −4.8%.
Which is cheaper, ISMF or TLT?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.65 percentage points a year. That is about $65 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ISMF against TLT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ismf-vs-tlt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.