Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ILF vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ILF returned +17.2% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ILF and PDBC
Net assets: $3.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Latin America 40 ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.
Pair scorecard
ILF costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 38.4 points; PDBC is 2.3 times larger.
| Measure | ILF | PDBC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +55.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 13.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P Latin America 40 | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $3.5bn | $8.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 55.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 14, 2014 to Oct 23, 2026 · 623 weekly returnsILF and PDBC returned about the same: +87.2% and +85.7%. PDBC swung less: 18.0% to 27.1%. PDBC fell less at its worst: −48.3% to −54.5%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | ILF | PDBC | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +87.2% | +85.7% | Tie | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +5.4% | +5.3% | Tie | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +9.8% | −17.2% | ILF | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 27.1% | 18.0% | PDBC | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 18.8% | 12.3% | PDBC | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −54.5% | −48.3% | PDBC | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.25 | 0.26 | PDBC (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.36 | 0.38 | PDBC (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.10 | 0.11 | PDBC | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 623 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ILF and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ILF and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ILF and PDBC do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. ILF follows S&P Latin America 40 and PDBC follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 ILF returned +17.2% and PDBC +55.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 38.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ILF
ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ILF or PDBC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +17.2% and PDBC +55.6%.
- Which is cheaper, ILF or PDBC?
- ILF is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ILF against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-pdbc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ILF against PDBC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-pdbc
[ILF against PDBC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-pdbc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.