Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ILF vs MTUM: how they differ
ILF and MTUM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.
iShares Latin America 40 ETF and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ILF and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ILF | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.31% | 0.09% |
| USD CASH | 0.53% | 0.07% |
| Only in ILF | Only in MTUM |
|---|---|
| NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.61% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 5.39% |
| VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 8.00% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.20% |
| ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.71% | INTEL CORPORATION 4.14% |
| PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.33% | CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.48% |
| GRUPO MEXICO B 6.02% | JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.38% |
| PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 5.94% | SANDISK 3.10% |
| GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.24% | APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.87% |
| CREDICORP LTD 3.85% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.69% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF | MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Latin America 40 | MSCI USA Momentum Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +33.4% | +21.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +15.9 pts | +4.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 98.2% |
| Holdings | 47 | 128 |
ILF in plain words
ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MTUM in plain words
MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 128 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ILF or MTUM?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +33.4% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ILF or MTUM?
- ILF charges 0.47% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ILF and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ILF and 98% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ILF against MTUM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-mtum Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources