Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ILF vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ILF returned +17.2% to IWM's +14.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ILF and IWM
Net assets: $3.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Latin America 40 ETF, and $75.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWM costs 0.28 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points; IWM is far larger, $75.5bn against $3.5bn.
| Measure | ILF | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +14.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 13.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026 | 7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P Latin America 40 | Russell 2000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.19% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $3.5bn | $75.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 55.6% | 3.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ILF and IWM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ILF and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ILF
ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
IWM
IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ILF or IWM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +17.2% and IWM +14.1%.
- Which is cheaper, ILF or IWM?
- IWM is cheaper, by 0.28 percentage points a year. That is about $28 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ILF against IWM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-iwm
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ILF against IWM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-iwm
[ILF against IWM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-iwm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.