Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IJS vs VGLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IJS returned +19.3% to VGLT's −6.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IJS and VGLT

Net assets: $7.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF, and $10.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF.

At a glance
+19.3%
IJS total return, 1 year
−6.7%
VGLT total return, 1 year
0.18%
IJS expense ratio
0.03%
VGLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGLT costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.0 points; VGLT is 1.4 times larger.

IJS vs VGLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJSVGLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+19.3%−6.7%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Aug 14, 202638.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P SmallCap 600 Value IndexBloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.6bn$10.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund8.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IJS and VGLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IJS VGLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IJS
PAYCOM SOFTWARE 1.09%
MATCH GROUP INC 1.08%
SM ENERGY 1.00%
JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.91%
CARMAX INC 0.82%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL 0.81%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS 0.80%
VICTORIA S SECRET 0.79%
Only in VGLT
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.19%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.13%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.13%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.10%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.08%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.08%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.07%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Tracks an index of Long-term Treasury
Total return, 1 year +19.3% −6.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +19.2% (SLYV) −6.7% (SCHQ)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SLYV 0.0 pts vs SCHQ
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.03%
Holdings 477 102
Net assets, IJS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGLT as of Sep 30, 2026 $7.7bn $10.4bn

IJS and VGLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IJS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IJS

IJS tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +19.2% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 477 positions, with the top ten at 8.8%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGLT

VGLT tracks an index of Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −6.7% with distributions reinvested, against −6.7% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 38.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJS or VGLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +19.3% and VGLT −6.7%.
Which is cheaper, IJS or VGLT?
VGLT is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IJS against VGLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijs-vs-vglt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.