Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IJS vs USHY: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IJS returned +19.3% to USHY's +1.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IJS and USHY
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.7bn for iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and $26.3bn for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
USHY costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.6 points; USHY is 3.4 times larger.
| Measure | IJS | USHY |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +19.3% | +1.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index | ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $7.7bn | $26.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 8.8% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 3, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 468 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: IJS against SLYV, Oct 13, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026; USHY against SPHY, Nov 3, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026.
IJS returned more: +105.3% to +47.3%. USHY swung less: 9.7% to 24.5%. USHY fell less at its worst: −21.9% to −46.2%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IJS | USHY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +105.3% | +47.3% | IJS | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +8.3% | +4.4% | IJS | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +77.9% | −14.9% | IJS | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 24.5% | 9.7% | USHY | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 17.0% | 6.8% | USHY | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −46.2% | −21.9% | USHY | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 98.3% | 104.0% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 100.4% | 103.7% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.99 | 1.07 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.95 | 0.95 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.34 | 0.21 | IJS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.49 | 0.30 | IJS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.102 | 0.019 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.18 | 0.20 | USHY | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | SLYV | SPHY | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −0.6% a year | −0.1% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.58 | −0.10 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −2.5% to +1.4% | −1.5% to +1.4% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.14 | 0.03 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 5.1% | 2.3% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 468 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IJS and USHY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IJS and USHY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJS and USHY do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IJS follows S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index and USHY follows ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IJS returned +19.3% and USHY +1.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 17.6 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IJS
IJS tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +19.2% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 477 positions, with the top ten at 8.8%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
USHY
USHY tracks an index of Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +1.8% for its benchmark, the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index, measured by the closely related ICE BofA US High Yield Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJS or USHY?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +19.3% and USHY +1.7%.
- Which is cheaper, IJS or USHY?
- USHY is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IJS against USHY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijs-vs-ushy
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IJS against USHY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijs-vs-ushy
[IJS against USHY (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijs-vs-ushy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.