Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IJS vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IJS returned +19.3% to QQQM's +15.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IJS and QQQM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.7bn for iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and $110.4bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+19.3%
IJS total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.18%
IJS expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.1 points; QQQM is 14.3 times larger.

IJS vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJSQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+19.3%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Aug 14, 20264.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P SmallCap 600 Value IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$7.7bn$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund8.8%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returns
IJS QQQM
Return
Total return edge QQQM +112.3% +157.2%
Annualized edge QQQM +13.3% +17.0%
Price return edge QQQM +93.7% +147.9%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 21.0% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge IJS −25.1% −35.0%
Downside capture 100.4% 99.8%
Beta 0.99 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQM 0.54 0.70
Sortino edge QQQM 0.82 1.07
Treynor 0.102 0.147
Calmar edge IJS (slight) 0.53 0.49
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.6% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.58 0.62
Information ratio −0.14 0.10
Tracking error 5.1% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: IJS against SLYV, Oct 13, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQM returned more: +157.2% to +112.3%. IJS and QQQM swung about the same: 21.0% and 21.0%. IJS fell less at its worst: −25.1% to −35.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IJS vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJSQQQMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+112.3%+157.2%QQQMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.3%+17.0%QQQMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+93.7%+147.9%QQQMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.0%21.0%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.9%13.6%QQQM (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−25.1%−35.0%IJSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.3%99.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.4%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.991.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.951.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.540.70QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.821.07QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1020.147Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.530.49IJS (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSLYVQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.6% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.580.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.5% to +1.4%−0.2% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.140.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.1%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IJS and QQQM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IJS QQQM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IJS
PAYCOM SOFTWARE 1.09%
MATCH GROUP INC 1.08%
SM ENERGY 1.00%
JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.91%
CARMAX INC 0.82%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL 0.81%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS 0.80%
VICTORIA S SECRET 0.79%
Only in QQQM
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +19.3% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +19.2% (SLYV) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SLYV 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 95.7%
Holdings 477 105
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.7bn $110.4bn

IJS and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-FD5AC9B749

IJS and QQQM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IJS follows S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IJS returned +19.3% and QQQM +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IJS and QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IJS

IJS tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +19.2% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 477 positions, with the top ten at 8.8%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJS or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +19.3% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, IJS or QQQM?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJS and QQQM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 96% of QQQM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IJS against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijs-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.