Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IJR vs RSSL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IJR returned +17.5% to RSSL's +14.1%; 43% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IJR and RSSL

Net assets: $104.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF, and $1.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+17.5%
IJR total return, 1 year
+14.1%
RSSL total return, 1 year
0.06%
IJR expense ratio
0.08%
RSSL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJR costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; IJR is far larger, $103.0bn against $1.4bn.

IJR vs RSSL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJRRSSL
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+14.1%
Drawdown
Below its high6.8%, high on Aug 14, 20267.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P SmallCap 600Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.06%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$103.0bn$1.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common43%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.3%3.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 14, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 123 weekly returns
IJR RSSL
Return
Total return edge RSSL +37.0% +42.2%
Annualized edge RSSL +14.3% +16.0%
Price return edge RSSL +32.0% +37.5%
Risk
Volatility edge IJR (slight) 18.7% 19.7%
Max drawdown edge Tie −24.3% −24.7%
Downside capture 98.9% 102.8%
Beta 0.99 1.06
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge RSSL (slight) 0.58 0.64
Sortino edge RSSL (slight) 0.87 0.96
Treynor 0.097 0.119
Calmar edge RSSL (slight) 0.59 0.65
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.6% a year −0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.91 −0.07
Information ratio 0.20 0.02
Tracking error 2.4% 12.1%

Each against its own benchmark: IJR against SPSM, Jul 19, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; RSSL against VOO, Jun 14, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

RSSL returned more: +42.2% to +37.0%. IJR swung slightly less: 18.7% to 19.7%. IJR and RSSL fell about the same at their worst: −24.3% and −24.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IJR vs RSSL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJRRSSLEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+37.0%+42.2%RSSLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.3%+16.0%RSSLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+32.0%+37.5%RSSLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility18.7%19.7%IJR (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.6%13.2%IJR (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−24.3%−24.7%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.7%102.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture98.9%102.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.991.06Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.990.63Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.64RSSL (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.870.96RSSL (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0970.119Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.590.65RSSL (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPSMVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.6% a year−0.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.91−0.07Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +1.9%−16.2% to +15.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.200.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error2.4%12.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 123 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

43%

By the books each fund has filed, IJR and RSSL hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

43% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IJR RSSL
VIASAT INC 0.55% 0.31%
GLAUKOS 0.61% 0.31%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 0.52% 0.27%
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES 0.35% 0.27%
STONEX GROUP INC 0.35% 0.27%
JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.48% 0.26%
SM ENERGY 0.53% 0.26%
ARGAN 0.27% 0.25%
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORP 0.41% 0.25%
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP 0.40% 0.24%
TG THERAPEUTICS 0.46% 0.24%
JBT MAREL 0.32% 0.24%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IJR
PAYCOM SOFTWARE 0.57%
MATCH GROUP INC 0.57%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.51%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.46%
RALLIANT 0.44%
CARMAX INC 0.43%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL 0.43%
ETSY 0.43%
Only in RSSL
MOOG INC. 0.36%
HUT 8 CORP. 0.36%
UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION 0.35%
CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 0.33%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. 0.31%
CARETRUST REIT, INC. 0.31%
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. 0.30%
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP 0.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +17.5% +14.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +17.6% (SPSM) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SPSM +0.4 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.06% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 642 1960
Net assets, IJR as of Oct 27, 2026 and RSSL as of Oct 12, 2026 $104.6bn $1.4bn

IJR and RSSL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-112ECFAA69

IJR and RSSL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IJR follows S&P SmallCap 600 and RSSL follows Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 43% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IJR returned +17.5% and RSSL +14.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IJR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IJR

IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.6% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 642 positions, with the top ten at 5.3%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

RSSL

RSSL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,960 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJR or RSSL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJR returned +17.5% and RSSL +14.1%.
Which is cheaper, IJR or RSSL?
IJR is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJR and RSSL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJR and 0% of RSSL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IJR against RSSL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijr-vs-rssl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.