Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IJR vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IJR returned +17.5% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IJR and MAGS

Net assets: $104.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF, and $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+17.5%
IJR total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.06%
IJR expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJR costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.7 points; IJR is 19.0 times larger.

IJR vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJRMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high6.8%, high on Aug 14, 20264.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P SmallCap 600No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.06%0.30%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$104.6bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.3%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IJR and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IJR MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IJR
GLAUKOS 0.61%
PAYCOM SOFTWARE 0.57%
MATCH GROUP INC 0.57%
VIASAT INC 0.55%
SM ENERGY 0.53%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 0.52%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.51%
JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.48%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +17.5% +5.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +17.6% (SPSM) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SPSM not measured
Expense ratio 0.06% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 22.5%
Holdings 642 8
Net assets, IJR as of Oct 27, 2026 and MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 $104.6bn $5.5bn

IJR and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IJR and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IJR

IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.6% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 642 positions, with the top ten at 5.3%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJR or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJR returned +17.5% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, IJR or MAGS?
IJR is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJR and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJR and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IJR against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijr-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.