Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJH vs PFF: how they differ
IJH and PFF hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and IJH returned more over the year.
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJH and PFF hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJH | PFF |
|---|---|---|
| REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA | 0.46% | 0.35% |
| BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC | 0.26% | 0.74% |
| COREBRIDGE FINANCIAL INC | 0.24% | 0.24% |
| WINTRUST FINANCIAL | 0.29% | 0.22% |
| BRUKER | 0.17% | 0.53% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.16% | 0.61% |
| CARLYLE GROUP INC | 0.32% | 0.15% |
| UMB FINANCIAL | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| WESTERN ALLIANCE | 0.23% | 0.15% |
| ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT REIT | 0.46% | 0.14% |
| VOYA FINANCIAL | 0.27% | 0.14% |
| UNUM | 0.40% | 0.13% |
| Only in IJH | Only in PFF |
|---|---|
| TWILIO CLASS A 1.00% | BOEING CO 3.54% |
| ILLUMINA INC 0.87% | ORACLE CORPORATION 2.31% |
| TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.86% | SUPER MICRO COMPUTER INC 2.30% |
| EVERPURE INC CLASS A 0.85% | ALPHABET INC 2.24% |
| OKTA CLASS A 0.82% | HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CONV PR 2.06% |
| ATI 0.78% | ALBEMARLE CORP 1.12% |
| NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.72% | MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED 0.89% |
| TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.65% | NEXTERA ENERGY UNITS 0.70% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | S&P MidCap 400 | Preferred and Income Securities |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | −0.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −4.1 pts | −18.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.45% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 21.6% |
| Holdings | 405 | 461 |
IJH in plain words
IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
PFF in plain words
PFF is an index equity fund tracking the Preferred and Income Securities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 23.1%. It sat 3.2% below its high of May 8, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJH or PFF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and PFF returned −0.8%, so IJH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJH or PFF?
- IJH charges 0.05% a year and PFF charges 0.45%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJH and PFF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 22% of PFF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against PFF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijh-vs-pff Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources