Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJH vs IXUS: how they differ

IJH and IXUS hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and IXUS hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJH and IXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJHIXUS
CULLEN FROST BANKERS0.29%0.28%
AUTOLIV0.24%0.45%
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP0.24%0.13%
CARLISLE COMPANIES0.38%0.13%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.16%0.09%
GENPACT0.15%0.09%
ORMAT TECH INC0.17%0.08%
VAIL RESORTS0.14%0.05%
VALARIS LTD0.16%0.05%
RB GLOBAL0.43%0.04%
HYATT HOTELS CORP CLASS A0.19%0.03%
AVIS BUDGET GROUP INC0.06%0.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJHOnly in IXUS
TWILIO CLASS A 1.00%TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.49%
ILLUMINA INC 0.87%SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.21%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.86%SK HYNIX 1.79%
EVERPURE INC CLASS A 0.85%ASML HOLDING 1.55%
OKTA CLASS A 0.82%HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.84%
ATI 0.78%TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.78%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.72%ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.70%
TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.65%ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.68%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IJH and IXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isS&P MidCap 400Core MSCI Total International Stock
Total return, 1 year+13.4%+22.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.1 pts+4.7 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings4052540

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2540 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or IXUS?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and IXUS returned +22.2%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJH or IXUS?
IJH charges 0.05% a year and IXUS charges 0.07%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJH and IXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 0% of IXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJH against IXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against IXUS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijh-vs-ixus Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources