Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJH vs IWF: how they differ
IJH and IWF hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IJH returned more over the year.
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJH and IWF hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJH | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.16% | 0.15% |
| ATI | 0.78% | 0.08% |
| EVERPURE INC CLASS A | 0.85% | 0.08% |
| CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY | 0.64% | 0.07% |
| MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS | 0.51% | 0.06% |
| ROKU CLASS A | 0.58% | 0.06% |
| WOODWARD | 0.57% | 0.06% |
| XPO | 0.61% | 0.06% |
| BURLINGTON STORES | 0.43% | 0.05% |
| LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR | 0.45% | 0.05% |
| TOAST CLASS A | 0.43% | 0.05% |
| USD CASH | 0.05% | 0.05% |
| Only in IJH | Only in IWF |
|---|---|
| ILLUMINA INC 0.87% | NVIDIA 15.46% |
| OKTA CLASS A 0.82% | APPLE 7.77% |
| TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.65% | ALPHABET CLASS A 5.88% |
| UNITED THERAPEUTICS 0.61% | MICROSOFT 5.55% |
| US FOODS HOLDING 0.60% | BROADCOM INC 5.10% |
| COEUR MINING 0.60% | ALPHABET CLASS C 4.77% |
| ROYAL GOLD 0.59% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.52% |
| RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 0.57% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | S&P MidCap 400 | Russell 1000 growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +7.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −4.1 pts | −10.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 93.6% |
| Holdings | 405 | 315 |
IJH in plain words
IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJH or IWF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and IWF returned +7.0%, so IJH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJH or IWF?
- IJH charges 0.05% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJH and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against IWF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijh-vs-iwf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources