Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IGSB vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IGSB returned +1.3% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IGSB and MAGS

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $23.7bn for iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and $5.5bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+1.3%
IGSB total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.04%
IGSB expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IGSB costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.5 points; IGSB is 4.3 times larger.

IGSB vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIGSBMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.3%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksICE BofA 1-5 Year US Corporate IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.04%0.30%
Net assets$23.7bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight22%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IGSB and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IGSB MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IGSB
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO S. R.L. 144A 0.29%
T-MOBILE USA INC 0.17%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.14%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.14%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.13%
ABBVIE INC 0.12%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.12%
BOEING CO 0.12%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IGSB iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +1.3% +5.8%
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.30%
Holdings 4781 8
Net assets $23.7bn $5.5bn

IGSB and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IGSB and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IGSB

IGSB tracks an index of 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGSB or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGSB returned +1.3% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, IGSB or MAGS?
IGSB is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IGSB against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igsb-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.