Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IGM vs IJT: how they differ
IGM and IJT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IGM and IJT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IGM | IJT |
|---|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.05% | 0.76% |
| FORMFACTOR INC | 0.04% | 1.03% |
| QORVO | 0.04% | 0.67% |
| VIASAT INC | 0.04% | 1.19% |
| MAXLINEAR | 0.03% | 0.30% |
| PLEXUS CORP | 0.03% | 0.34% |
| RALLIANT | 0.03% | 0.44% |
| ACI WORLDWIDE | 0.02% | 0.41% |
| ACM RESEARCH CLASS A | 0.02% | 0.49% |
| AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES | 0.02% | 0.26% |
| BADGER METER | 0.02% | 0.43% |
| BOX INC CLASS A | 0.02% | 0.36% |
| Only in IGM | Only in IJT |
|---|---|
| MICROSOFT 10.11% | CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS 1.29% |
| APPLE 9.14% | BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 1.09% |
| NVIDIA 8.89% | PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 1.03% |
| BROADCOM INC 7.42% | RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.98% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.87% | ALKERMES 0.91% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY 4.73% | STONEX GROUP INC 0.87% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 4.23% | TG THERAPEUTICS 0.86% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.66% | MADISON SQUARE GARDEN SPORTS CLASS 0.83% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Expanded Tech Sector | S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.7% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +15.2 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 92.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 272 | 355 |
IGM in plain words
IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 272 positions, with the top ten at 58.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IJT in plain words
IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 355 positions, with the top ten at 10.1%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IGM or IJT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and IJT returned +17.6%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IGM or IJT?
- IGM charges 0.37% a year and IJT charges 0.18%, so IJT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IGM and IJT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 0% of IJT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGM against IJT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-ijt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources