Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IGIB vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IGIB returned −1.8% to MOAT's +10.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IGIB and MOAT

Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

At a glance
−1.8%
IGIB total return, 1 year
+10.3%
MOAT total return, 1 year
0.04%
IGIB expense ratio
0.46%
MOAT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IGIB costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.1 points; IGIB is 1.7 times larger.

IGIB vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIGIBMOAT
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.8%+10.3%
Drawdown
Below its high3.2%, high on Feb 27, 20263.7%, high on Aug 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksICE BofA 5-10 Year US Corporate IndexMorningstar Wide Moat Focus Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.04%0.46%
Net assets, as of Oct 23, 2026$19.5bn$11.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IGIB and MOAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IGIB MOAT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IGIB
AMAZON.COM INC 0.22%
META PLATFORMS INC 0.22%
META PLATFORMS INC 0.20%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.19%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP MTN 0.19%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.19%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP MTN 0.18%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP MTN 0.18%
Only in MOAT
Danaher Corp 2.85%
Microsoft Corp 2.81%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc 2.78%
Tyler Technologies Inc 2.73%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc 2.65%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.57%
Kenvue Inc 2.57%
Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc 2.55%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IGIB iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond Tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year −1.8% +10.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −3.4 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.46%
Holdings 3064 54
Net assets, IGIB as of Oct 28, 2026 and MOAT as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.5bn $11.6bn

IGIB and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IGIB and MOAT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IGIB

IGIB tracks an index of 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MOAT

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGIB or MOAT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGIB returned −1.8% and MOAT +10.3%.
Which is cheaper, IGIB or MOAT?
IGIB is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IGIB against MOAT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igib-vs-moat

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.