Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IEMG vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IEMG returned +15.3% to MTUM's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IEMG and MTUM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $150.4bn for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

At a glance
+15.3%
IEMG total return, 1 year
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
0.09%
IEMG expense ratio
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEMG costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points; IEMG is 8.0 times larger.

IEMG vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIEMGMTUM
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.3%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high10.1%, high on Jun 22, 202611.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI)MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$150.4bn$18.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund32.7%35.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 704 weekly returns
IEMG MTUM
Return
Total return edge MTUM +112.4% +554.7%
Annualized edge MTUM +5.7% +14.9%
Price return edge MTUM +50.4% +459.1%
Risk
Volatility edge IEMG (slight) 18.4% 19.0%
Max drawdown edge MTUM −37.1% −31.9%
Downside capture 97.1% 101.7%
Beta 0.96 1.02
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MTUM 0.29 0.73
Sortino edge MTUM 0.41 1.07
Treynor 0.057 0.135
Calmar edge MTUM 0.15 0.47
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.7% a year +1.3% a year
Alpha t-stat 2.17 0.53
Information ratio 0.38 0.17
Tracking error 1.4% 9.3%

Each against its own benchmark: IEMG against EEM, Nov 2, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026; MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

MTUM returned more: +554.7% to +112.4%. IEMG swung slightly less: 18.4% to 19.0%. MTUM fell less at its worst: −31.9% to −37.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IEMG vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIEMGMTUMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+112.4%+554.7%MTUMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+5.7%+14.9%MTUMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+50.4%+459.1%MTUMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility18.4%19.0%IEMG (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.1%13.0%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−37.1%−31.9%MTUMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture94.6%106.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.1%101.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.961.02Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.76Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.290.73MTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.411.07MTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0570.135Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.150.47MTUMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkEEMMLRGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.7% a year+1.3% a yearMTUM not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat2.170.53Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range+0.1% to +1.4%−3.7% to +6.3%MTUM includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.380.17Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.4%9.3%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 704 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IEMG and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IEMG MTUM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IEMG
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 14.03%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.05%
SK HYNIX 4.31%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.32%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.60%
MEDIATEK 1.36%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.83%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.80%
Only in MTUM
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year +15.3% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark −1.0 pts vs EEM +4.8 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 93.2%
Holdings 2857 126
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $150.4bn $18.7bn

IEMG and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-9163A663D5

IEMG and MTUM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IEMG follows MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI) and MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IEMG returned +15.3% and MTUM +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IEMG and MTUM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IEMG

IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,857 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%. It sat 10.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEMG or MTUM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEMG returned +15.3% and MTUM +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, IEMG or MTUM?
IEMG is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IEMG and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEMG and 93% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IEMG against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iemg-vs-mtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.