Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IEMG vs INDA: how they differ

IEMG and INDA hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and IEMG returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and iShares MSCI India ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IEMG and INDA hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IEMG and INDA both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIEMGINDA
HDFC BANK0.57%5.82%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD0.54%5.49%
ICICI BANK0.53%5.39%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.46%2.40%
BHARTI AIRTEL LTD0.38%3.87%
INFOSYS0.23%2.37%
AXIS BANK0.20%2.09%
MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LTD0.20%2.03%
BAJAJ FINANCE LTD0.19%1.94%
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD0.19%1.99%
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD0.17%1.71%
STATE BANK OF INDIA0.14%1.39%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IEMGOnly in INDA
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 13.46%CASH COLLATERAL USD WFFUT 0.02%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.62%
SK HYNIX 5.38%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.35%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.61%
MEDIATEK 1.52%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.86%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IEMG and INDA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore MSCI Emerging MarketsMSCI India
Total return, 1 year+30.6%−8.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.1 pts−26.3 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.61%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings1832168

IEMG in plain words

IEMG is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +30.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1832 positions, with the top ten at 34.0%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

INDA in plain words

INDA is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI India. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −8.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.61% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 168 positions, with the top ten at 33.4%. It sat 17.4% below its high of Sep 26, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEMG or INDA?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEMG returned +30.6% and INDA returned −8.8%, so IEMG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IEMG or INDA?
IEMG charges 0.09% a year and INDA charges 0.61%, so IEMG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IEMG and INDA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEMG and 0% of INDA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IEMG against INDA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEMG against INDA, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iemg-vs-inda Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources