Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IEMG vs IJT: how they differ
IEMG and IJT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IEMG returned more over the year.
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IEMG and IJT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IEMG | IJT |
|---|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.46% | 0.76% |
| OUTSURANCE GROUP | 0.03% | 0.35% |
| MR PRICE GROUP LTD | 0.02% | 0.32% |
| Only in IEMG | Only in IJT |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 13.46% | CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS 1.29% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.62% | VIASAT INC 1.19% |
| SK HYNIX 5.38% | BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 1.09% |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.35% | PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 1.03% |
| ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.61% | FORMFACTOR INC 1.03% |
| MEDIATEK 1.52% | RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.98% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.86% | ALKERMES 0.91% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.74% | STONEX GROUP INC 0.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core MSCI Emerging Markets | S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +30.6% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.1 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 1832 | 355 |
IEMG in plain words
IEMG is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +30.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1832 positions, with the top ten at 34.0%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IJT in plain words
IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 355 positions, with the top ten at 10.1%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IEMG or IJT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEMG returned +30.6% and IJT returned +17.6%, so IEMG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IEMG or IJT?
- IEMG charges 0.09% a year and IJT charges 0.18%, so IEMG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IEMG and IJT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEMG and 0% of IJT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEMG against IJT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iemg-vs-ijt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources