Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IEFA vs IJT: how they differ
IEFA and IJT hold 1% of their weight in the same names.
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and IJT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IEFA | IJT |
|---|---|---|
| AIRBUS GROUP | 0.53% | 0.58% |
| LVMH | 0.46% | 0.26% |
| CREDIT AGRICOLE SA | 0.08% | 0.54% |
| FINECOBANK BANCA FINECO | 0.06% | 0.12% |
| CONTINENTAL AG | 0.03% | 0.24% |
| PLUS500 | 0.02% | 0.17% |
| USD CASH | 0.03% | 0.02% |
| APERAM SA | 0.01% | 0.18% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.01% | 0.76% |
| CAPITALAND ASCOTT STAPLED UNIT TRU | 0.01% | 0.12% |
| MERCURY NZ LTD | 0.01% | 0.32% |
| NEW HOPE CORPORATION LTD | 0.01% | 0.33% |
| Only in IEFA | Only in IJT |
|---|---|
| ASML HOLDING 2.62% | CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS 1.29% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.40% | VIASAT INC 1.19% |
| ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.18% | BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 1.09% |
| SHELL PLC 1.09% | PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 1.03% |
| MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.00% | FORMFACTOR INC 1.03% |
| NOVARTIS AG 0.99% | RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.98% |
| NESTLE SA 0.97% | ALKERMES 0.91% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.94% | STONEX GROUP INC 0.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core MSCI EAFE | S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.0% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.5 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 1650 | 355 |
IEFA in plain words
IEFA is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1650 positions, with the top ten at 12.0%.
IJT in plain words
IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 355 positions, with the top ten at 10.1%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or IJT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +18.0% and IJT returned +17.6%, so IEFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IEFA or IJT?
- IEFA charges 0.07% a year and IJT charges 0.18%, so IEFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IEFA and IJT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEFA and 0% of IJT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEFA against IJT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-ijt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources