Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IDEV vs ITOT: how they differ

IDEV and ITOT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IDEV returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IDEV and ITOT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IDEV and ITOT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIDEVITOT
USD CASH0.13%0.09%
ARISTOCRAT LEISURE0.08%0.09%
MERCK0.06%0.50%
HELVETIA BALOISE HOLDING N AG0.07%0.05%
ROCHE PS PAR AG1.02%0.05%
EQT0.05%0.05%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM N AG0.38%0.04%
VINCI SA0.21%0.04%
ADMIRAL GROUP PLC0.04%0.06%
ESSILORLUXOTTICA SA0.17%0.03%
KEYERA0.04%0.03%
PEMBINA PIPELINE0.09%0.03%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IDEVOnly in ITOT
ASML HOLDING 2.29%NVIDIA 7.32%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.22%APPLE 6.63%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.98%MICROSOFT 5.06%
SHELL PLC 0.91%AMAZON.COM INC 3.41%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 0.88%ALPHABET CLASS A 2.70%
NOVARTIS AG 0.87%BROADCOM INC 2.37%
NESTLE SA 0.85%ALPHABET CLASS C 2.16%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.83%META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.96%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IDEV and ITOT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore MSCI International Developed MarketsCore S&P Total U.S. Stock Market
Total return, 1 year+18.7%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.2 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5000.1%88.3%
Holdings17821167

IDEV in plain words

IDEV is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI International Developed Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1782 positions, with the top ten at 10.6%.

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1167 positions, with the top ten at 34.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IDEV or ITOT?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IDEV returned +18.7% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so IDEV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IDEV or ITOT?
IDEV charges 0.04% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IDEV and ITOT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IDEV and 88% of ITOT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IDEV against ITOT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IDEV against ITOT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/idev-vs-itot Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources