Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IBDW vs NEAR: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jul 31, 2026 IBDW's duration was 4.2 years and NEAR's 2.1; IBDW charges 0.10% to NEAR's 0.25%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IBDW and NEAR
Net assets: $2.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF, and $5.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF.
Pair scorecard
IBDW costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.4 points; NEAR is 1.9 times larger.
| Measure | IBDW | NEAR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.6% | +1.8% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $2.7bn | $5.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jul 2, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 277 weekly returns · each against IUSBNEAR returned more: +21.2% to +0.5%. NEAR swung less: 1.3% to 6.9%. NEAR fell less at its worst: −1.2% to −23.3%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IBDW | NEAR | IUSB | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +0.5% | +21.2% | NEAR | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +0.1% | +3.7% | NEAR | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | −19.8% | −0.2% | NEAR | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 6.9% | 1.3% | NEAR | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 5.2% | 0.9% | NEAR | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −23.3% | −1.2% | NEAR | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 120.9% | 26.0% | 100.0% | IBDW | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 114.3% | 6.7% | 100.0% | NEAR | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 1.21 | 0.16 | 1.00 | NEAR lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.93 | 0.47 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | −0.49 | −0.06 | NEAR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | −0.65 | −0.08 | NEAR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | −0.028 | −0.005 | −0.035 | NEAR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 0.00 | 2.96 | NEAR | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | IUSB | IUSB | IUSB | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.9% a year | +0.5% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 1.14 | 1.20 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −0.6% to +2.4% | −0.3% to +1.3% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | 0.06 | 0.73 | NEAR | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 2.1% | 4.7% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 277 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IBDW and NEAR hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
4% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IBDW and NEAR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBDW and NEAR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IBDW follows Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index and NEAR follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 4% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IBDW returned −0.6% and NEAR +1.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IBDW
IBDW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.6% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
NEAR
NEAR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IBDW or NEAR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBDW returned −0.6% and NEAR +1.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IBDW or NEAR?
- IBDW is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IBDW against NEAR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibdw-vs-near
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IBDW against NEAR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibdw-vs-near
[IBDW against NEAR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibdw-vs-near)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.