Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IAU vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees
IAU is a commodity fund and RDVY an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RDVY returned +17.6% against +2.7%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IAU and RDVYNet assets: $60.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Gold Trust, and $25.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.
Pair scorecard
IAU costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.9 points; IAU is 2.4 times larger.
| Measure | IAU | RDVY |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.7% | +17.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 24.6%, high on Jan 29, 2026 | 5.3%, high on Aug 13, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Gold | Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.47% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $60.3bn | $25.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 94% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 22.1% | |
Risk and return
Jan 17, 2014 to Oct 23, 2026 · 666 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: IAU against GLD, Feb 4, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026; RDVY against VOO, Jan 17, 2014 to Oct 23, 2026.
RDVY returned more: +388.8% to +209.0%. IAU swung less: 15.3% to 19.4%. IAU fell less at its worst: −24.1% to −39.0%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IAU | RDVY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +209.0% | +388.8% | RDVY | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +9.2% | +13.2% | RDVY | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +209.0% | +292.1% | RDVY | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 15.3% | 19.4% | IAU | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 10.2% | 13.3% | IAU | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −24.1% | −39.0% | IAU | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 100.4% | 106.3% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 100.0% | 104.2% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.09 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 0.83 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.52 | 0.63 | RDVY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.78 | 0.93 | RDVY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.098 | 0.113 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.38 | 0.34 | IAU | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | GLD | VOO | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.1% a year | −1.0% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.67 | −0.44 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.2% to +0.4% | −5.4% to +3.4% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.18 | 0.02 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 0.7% | 8.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 666 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
IAU and RDVY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IAU and RDVY do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IAU follows Gold and RDVY follows Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IAU returned +2.7% and RDVY +17.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.9 points.
- Cost. IAU charges 0.25% of assets a year and RDVY 0.47%, a gap of 0.22 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Its expense ratio is 0.25% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
IAU holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +2.5% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
RDVY
RDVY tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 22.1%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IAU or RDVY?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IAU returned +2.7% and RDVY +17.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IAU or RDVY?
- IAU is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IAU against RDVY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iau-vs-rdvy
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IAU against RDVY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iau-vs-rdvy
[IAU against RDVY (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iau-vs-rdvy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.