Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HYMB vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HYMB returned −1.0% to VGT's +24.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HYMB and VGT

Net assets: $3.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
−1.0%
HYMB total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.35%
HYMB expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.7 points; VGT is far larger, $154.5bn against $3.7bn.

HYMB vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHYMBVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.0%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Jul 2, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.35%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$3.7bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight87%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 21, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026 · 809 weekly returns
HYMB VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT +84.8% +1,608.2%
Annualized edge VGT +4.0% +20.0%
Price return edge VGT −4.7% +1,367.4%
Risk
Volatility edge HYMB 8.7% 20.9%
Max drawdown edge HYMB −22.5% −34.1%
Downside capture 88.6% 99.9%
Beta 1.31 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VGT 0.31 0.90
Sortino edge VGT 0.42 1.36
Treynor 0.021 0.201
Calmar edge VGT 0.18 0.59
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.9% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.23 0.80
Information ratio 0.33 0.19
Tracking error 6.4% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: HYMB against AGG, Apr 21, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +1,608.2% to +84.8%. HYMB swung less: 8.7% to 20.9%. HYMB fell less at its worst: −22.5% to −34.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: HYMB vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHYMBVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+84.8%+1,608.2%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+4.0%+20.0%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−4.7%+1,367.4%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility8.7%20.9%HYMBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.4%13.8%HYMBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−22.5%−34.1%HYMBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture104.0%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.6%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.311.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.491.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.310.90VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.421.36VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0210.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.180.59VGTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkAGGFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.9% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.230.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.2% to +5.0%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.330.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.4%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 809 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HYMB and VGT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HYMB VGT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HYMB
PRCGEN 5.000 07/01/58 1.94%
PRCGEN 4.784 07/01/58 1.25%
BUCGEN 5.000 06/01/55 1.08%
PRC 4.000 07/01/46 0.64%
PRCGEN 4.329 07/01/40 0.61%
NYCDEV 5.000 11/15/44 0.49%
PRC 4.000 07/01/41 0.47%
CHIEDU 6.000 12/01/41 0.46%
Only in VGT
NVIDIA Corp 17.58%
Apple Inc 15.91%
Microsoft Corp 11.16%
Micron Technology Inc 4.45%
Broadcom Inc 4.11%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.67%
Intel Corp 1.98%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HYMB State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year −1.0% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark +0.4 pts vs AGG −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.09%
Holdings 2105 320
Net assets, HYMB as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $3.8bn $154.5bn

HYMB and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-930394FA56

HYMB and VGT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. HYMB follows ICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal Index and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 HYMB returned −1.0% and VGT +24.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 25.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

HYMB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HYMB

HYMB tracks an index of Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jul 2, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HYMB or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYMB returned −1.0% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, HYMB or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HYMB against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hymb-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.