Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HYG vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HYG returned +1.3% to IWF's +0.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HYG and IWF

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $17.5bn for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF and $124.7bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+1.3%
HYG total return, 1 year
+0.9%
IWF total return, 1 year
0.49%
HYG expense ratio
0.18%
IWF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWF costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; IWF is 7.1 times larger.

HYG vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHYGIWF
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.3%+0.9%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMarkit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$17.5bn$124.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HYG and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HYG IWF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HYG
1261229 BC LTD 144A 0.56%
MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC 144A 0.44%
ECHOSTAR CORP 0.40%
QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC 144A 0.35%
PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 LLC 144A 0.34%
CLOUD SOFTWARE GROUP LLC 144A 0.32%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP 144A 0.32%
CENTENE CORPORATION 0.31%
Only in IWF
NVIDIA 15.30%
APPLE 8.18%
MICROSOFT 5.94%
ALPHABET CLASS A 5.62%
BROADCOM INC 4.79%
ALPHABET CLASS C 4.53%
TESLA INC 3.58%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US high yield bonds Tracks the Russell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year +1.3% +0.9%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.2% (IUSB) +1.1% (VONG)
Gap to its benchmark +2.5 pts vs IUSB −0.2 pts vs VONG
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.18%
Holdings 1332 374
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $17.5bn $124.7bn

HYG and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HYG and IWF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HYG

HYG tracks an index of US high yield bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.

IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HYG or IWF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYG returned +1.3% and IWF +0.9%.
Which is cheaper, HYG or IWF?
IWF is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HYG against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyg-vs-iwf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.