Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HGER vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HGER returned +46.9% to VTWO's +14.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HGER and VTWO

Net assets: $5.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+46.9%
HGER total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.68%
HGER expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 0.62 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 32.6 points.

HGER vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHGERVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+46.9%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high7.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksQuantix Commodity IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.06%
Net assets, HGER as of Oct 28, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026$5.0bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HGER and VTWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HGER VTWO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HGER
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.42%
Moog Inc 0.36%
10X Genomics Inc 0.35%
JFrog Ltd 0.35%
UMB Financial Corp 0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.31%
Glaukos Corp 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +46.9% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.5%
Holdings 0 2002
Net assets, HGER as of Oct 28, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $5.0bn $16.6bn

HGER and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HGER flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HGER

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HGER or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +46.9% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, HGER or VTWO?
VTWO is cheaper, by 0.62 percentage points a year. That is about $62 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HGER and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of HGER and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HGER against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.