Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
HACK vs HAKY: Differences, Returns & Fees
HACK and HAKY are measured over different days, and HACK charges 0.60% to HAKY's 0.65%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about HACK and HAKYNet assets on Oct 28, 2026: $3.7bn for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF and $14m for Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF.
Pair scorecard
HACK costs 0.05 points a year less; HACK is far larger, $3.7bn against $14m.
| Measure | HACK | HAKY |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +47.5% | not published |
| Cash paid, share of starting value, since Jan 21, 2026 | 12.5% | |
| Price change, since Jan 21, 2026 | rose 34.1% | |
| Latest payout, annualized | 14.0% | |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Cybersecurity | Benchmark: Cybersecurity, measured through HACK |
| Against its benchmark, same days | behind by 18.7 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.65% |
| Net assets | $3.7bn | $14m |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 95% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 82% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 42% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 53% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 28, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jan 30, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026 · 38 weekly returnsHACK returned more: +65.5% to +47.8%. HACK fell slightly less at its worst: −10.5% to −11.2%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | HACK | HAKY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +65.5% | +47.8% | HACK | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | +65.5% | +31.6% | HACK | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −10.5% | −11.2% | HACK (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 38 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, HACK and HAKY hold 82% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 28, 2026.
half
82% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
HACK and HAKY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for HAKY.
HACK
By weight, 42% of HACK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 24 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +47.5% with distributions reinvested.
HAKY
Over the period from its first trade on Jan 21, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026, HAKY paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 34.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +50.6%. Cybersecurity (HACK) returned +69.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 18.7 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
- Are HACK and HAKY in the same category?
- HACK is a thematic ETF and HAKY is an option-income ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which is cheaper, HACK or HAKY?
- HACK is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HACK against HAKY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hack-vs-haky
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). HACK against HAKY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hack-vs-haky
[HACK against HAKY (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hack-vs-haky)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.