Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GSLC vs QDF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GSLC returned +13.3% to QDF's +17.7%; 38% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GSLC and QDF

Net assets: $15.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF, and $2.2bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF.

At a glance
+13.3%
GSLC total return, 1 year
+17.7%
QDF total return, 1 year
0.09%
GSLC expense ratio
0.39%
QDF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GSLC costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.4 points.

GSLC vs QDF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGSLCQDF
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.3%+17.7%
Benchmark
What it tracksGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity IndexNorthern Trust Quality Dividend Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.39%
Net assets, GSLC as of Nov 3, 2026 and QDF as of Jul 31, 2026$15.3bn$2.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common38%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.2%39.4%

Method

Risk and return

Oct 2, 2015 to Oct 30, 2026 · 578 weekly returns
GSLC QDF
Return
Total return edge GSLC +327.4% +256.7%
Annualized edge GSLC +14.0% +12.1%
Price return edge GSLC +263.1% +168.0%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 16.7% 16.5%
Max drawdown edge GSLC (slight) −31.8% −34.4%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GSLC 0.73 0.64
Sortino edge GSLC 1.05 0.90
Calmar edge GSLC 0.44 0.35
Reading

From Oct 2015 to Oct 2026, GSLC returned more: +327.4% to +256.7%. GSLC and QDF swung about the same: 16.7% and 16.5%. GSLC fell slightly less at its worst: −31.8% to −34.4%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GSLC vs QDF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGSLCQDFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+327.4%+256.7%GSLCPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.0%+12.1%GSLCTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+263.1%+168.0%GSLCPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.7%16.5%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.6%11.7%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.8%−34.4%GSLC (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.730.64GSLCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.050.90GSLCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.440.35GSLCAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 578 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

38%

By the books each fund has filed, GSLC and QDF hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

38% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GSLC QDF
APPLE INC 6.96% 8.67%
NVIDIA CORP 8.02% 6.33%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.32% 3.97%
ALPHABET INC 2.87% 2.40%
BROADCOM INC 2.32% 4.01%
ALPHABET INC 1.79% 1.95%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 1.26% 2.56%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.85% 2.81%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 1.22% 0.71%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 0.67% 2.57%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.53% 2.96%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.65% 0.45%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GSLC
AMAZON.COM INC 3.52%
META PLATFORMS INC 1.86%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.24%
TESLA INC 1.03%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 0.89%
WALMART INC 0.72%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 0.69%
ATLASSIAN CORP 0.56%
Only in QDF
Best Buy Co., Inc. 0.74%
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. 0.63%
Bath & Body Works, Inc. 0.60%
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. 0.60%
Public Storage 0.60%
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 0.58%
H&R Block, Inc. 0.56%
Electronic Arts, Inc. 0.56%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF QDF Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +13.3% +17.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.8% (VOO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −1.5 pts vs VOO not measured
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.39%
Already in the S&P 500 93.7% 85.9%
Holdings 426 123
Net assets, GSLC as of Nov 3, 2026 and QDF as of Jul 31, 2026 $15.3bn $2.2bn

GSLC and QDF on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GSLC

GSLC tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +13.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 426 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

QDF

QDF tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +17.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 123 positions, with the top ten at 39.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GSLC or QDF?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GSLC returned +13.3% and QDF +17.7%.
Which is cheaper, GSLC or QDF?
GSLC is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GSLC and QDF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GSLC and 86% of QDF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GSLC against QDF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gslc-vs-qdf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.