Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GRNY vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GRNY returned +6.5% to SCHP's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GRNY and SCHP

Net assets: $4.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF, and $16.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

At a glance
+6.5%
GRNY total return, 1 year
−0.8%
SCHP total return, 1 year
0.75%
GRNY expense ratio
0.03%
SCHP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHP costs 0.72 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.3 points.

GRNY vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGRNYSCHP
Return
Total return, 1 year+6.5%−0.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedUS TIPS
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.03%
Net assets, GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026$4.3bn$16.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight98%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GRNY SCHP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GRNY
Arista Networks Inc 2.92%
General Electric Co 2.76%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.66%
Packaging Corp of America 2.66%
PNC Financial Services Group I 2.63%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.61%
Robinhood Markets Inc 2.61%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp 2.59%
Only in SCHP
United States Treasury 4.07%
United States Treasury 4.01%
United States Treasury 4.00%
United States Treasury 3.77%
United States Treasury 3.60%
United States Treasury 3.40%
United States Treasury 3.38%
United States Treasury 3.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of US TIPS
Total return, 1 year +6.5% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.6 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.03%
Holdings 43 48
Net assets, GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026 $4.3bn $16.5bn

GRNY and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GRNY

GRNY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 43 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHP

SCHP tracks an index of US TIPS. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or SCHP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +6.5% and SCHP −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or SCHP?
SCHP is cheaper, by 0.72 percentage points a year. That is about $72 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GRNY against SCHP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/grny-vs-schp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.