Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or VB?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +2.8% and VB +14.4%.

Which is cheaper, GLDM or VB?

VB is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

GLDM vs VB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

GLDM is a commodity fund and VB an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VB returned +14.4% against +2.8%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GLDM and VB

Net assets: $30.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust, and $76.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF.

GLDM on its own →VB on its own →

At a glance

+2.8%

GLDM total return, 1 year

+14.4%

VB total return, 1 year

0.10%

GLDM expense ratio

0.03%

VB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VB costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.6 points; VB is 2.5 times larger.

GLDM vs VB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	GLDM	VB
Return
Measure	GLDM	VB
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+14.4%
Drawdown
Measure	GLDM	VB
Below its high	24.5%, high on Jan 29, 2026	5.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	GLDM	VB
What it tracks	Gold	Morningstar US Small Cap Index
Cost and size
Measure	GLDM	VB
Expense ratio	0.10%	0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026	$30.7bn	$76.9bn
Holdings
Measure	GLDM	VB
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		22%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		5.9%

Method

Side by side

GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF

Issuer State Street Vanguard

What it is Holds gold Tracks an index of Small-Cap

Total return, 1 year +2.8% +14.4%

Its benchmark over the same days +2.5% (GLD) not measured

Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs GLD not measured

Expense ratio 0.10% 0.03%

Holdings not counted 1303

Net assets, GLDM as of Oct 27, 2026 and VB as of Sep 30, 2026 $30.6bn $76.9bn

GLDM and VB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

GLDM

Its expense ratio is 0.10% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLDM holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.5% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.5% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VB tracks an index of Small-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,303 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or VB?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +2.8% and VB +14.4%.
Which is cheaper, GLDM or VB?: VB is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

GLDM vs IWM GLDM vs IWC GLDM vs IJR GLDM vs VTWO IAU vs VB USO vs VB SLV vs VB SIVR vs VB

Where to next

GLDM on its own →VB on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →VB dividend history →VB holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

State Street website ↗

VB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

VB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Vanguard page for VB ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GLDM against VB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gldm-vs-vb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.