Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or URTH?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +2.8% and URTH +13.1%.

Which is cheaper, GLDM or URTH?

GLDM is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

GLDM vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

GLDM is a commodity fund and URTH an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, URTH returned +13.1% against +2.8%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GLDM and URTH

Net assets: $30.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust, and $8.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF.

GLDM on its own →URTH on its own →

At a glance

+2.8%

GLDM total return, 1 year

+13.1%

URTH total return, 1 year

0.10%

GLDM expense ratio

0.24%

URTH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GLDM costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.3 points; GLDM is 3.5 times larger.

GLDM vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	GLDM	URTH
Return
Measure	GLDM	URTH
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+13.1%
Drawdown
Measure	GLDM	URTH
Below its high	24.5%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	GLDM	URTH
What it tracks	Gold	MSCI World Index
Cost and size
Measure	GLDM	URTH
Expense ratio	0.10%	0.24%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$30.6bn	$8.8bn
Holdings
Measure	GLDM	URTH
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		69%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		27.2%

Method

Side by side

GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust URTH iShares MSCI World ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF

Issuer State Street iShares

What it is Holds gold Tracks the MSCI World

Total return, 1 year +2.8% +13.1%

Its benchmark over the same days +2.5% (GLD) +13.4% (ACWI)

Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs GLD −0.3 pts vs ACWI

Expense ratio 0.10% 0.24%

Holdings not counted 1254

Net assets, GLDM as of Oct 27, 2026 and URTH as of Oct 28, 2026 $30.6bn $8.9bn

GLDM and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

GLDM

Its expense ratio is 0.10% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLDM holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.5% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.5% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

URTH

URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or URTH?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +2.8% and URTH +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, GLDM or URTH?: GLDM is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

ACWI vs GLDM GLDM vs VT GLDM vs INDA AVDV vs GLDM IAU vs URTH URTH vs USO SLV vs URTH SIVR vs URTH

Where to next

GLDM on its own →URTH on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →URTH dividend history →URTH holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

State Street website ↗

URTH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

URTH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for URTH ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GLDM against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gldm-vs-urth

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.