Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GLDM vs IEFA: how they differ

GLDM is a commodity fund and IEFA an equity index fund, and over the year GLDM returned more, +19.4% against +18.0%.

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF.

GLDM and IEFA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetiShares
What it isGold MiniSharesCore MSCI EAFE
Total return, 1 year+19.4%+18.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.9 pts+0.5 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.07%
Holdingsnot filed1650

GLDM in plain words

GLDM is a commodity fund tracking the Gold MiniShares. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. It sat 19.4% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IEFA in plain words

IEFA is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1650 positions, with the top ten at 12.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or IEFA?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +19.4% and IEFA returned +18.0%, so GLDM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GLDM or IEFA?
GLDM charges 0.18% a year and IEFA charges 0.07%, so IEFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLDM against IEFA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLDM against IEFA, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gldm-vs-iefa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources