Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GARP vs VCIT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GARP returned +18.0% to VCIT's −1.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GARP and VCIT

Net assets: $3.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF, and $66.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+18.0%
GARP total return, 1 year
−1.8%
VCIT total return, 1 year
0.15%
GARP expense ratio
0.03%
VCIT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VCIT costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.8 points; VCIT is 19.6 times larger.

GARP vs VCIT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGARPVCIT
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.0%−1.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.0%, high on Oct 6, 20263.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Quality GARP Select IndexBloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$3.4bn$66.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund43.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and VCIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GARP VCIT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GARP
MICROSOFT 5.67%
APPLE 5.66%
NVIDIA 5.18%
VISA CLASS A 5.13%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.72%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 4.61%
LAM RESEARCH 3.31%
CATERPILLAR INC 3.29%
Only in VCIT
MKTLIQ 0.58%
Amazon.com Inc 0.29%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.28%
Meta Platforms Inc 0.27%
Boeing Co 0.27%
Bank of America Corp 0.27%
Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.26%
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc 0.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year +18.0% −1.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) −1.8% (SCHI)
Gap to its benchmark +4.7 pts vs PBUS 0.0 pts vs SCHI
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.03%
Holdings 131 2340
Net assets, GARP as of Oct 27, 2026 and VCIT as of Sep 30, 2026 $3.6bn $66.6bn

GARP and VCIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

GARP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GARP

GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.5%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VCIT

VCIT tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.8% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or VCIT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +18.0% and VCIT −1.8%.
Which is cheaper, GARP or VCIT?
VCIT is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GARP against VCIT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/garp-vs-vcit

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.