Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GARP vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GARP returned +18.0% to IWF's +0.9%; 55% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GARP and IWF

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $3.6bn for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and $124.7bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+18.0%
GARP total return, 1 year
+0.9%
IWF total return, 1 year
0.15%
GARP expense ratio
0.18%
IWF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GARP costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.1 points; IWF is far larger, $124.7bn against $3.6bn.

GARP vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGARPIWF
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.0%+0.9%
Drawdown
Below its high7.0%, high on Oct 6, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Quality GARP Select IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.6bn$124.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common55%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund43.5%57.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jan 24, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 352 weekly returns
GARP IWF
Return
Total return edge GARP +232.4% +172.2%
Annualized edge GARP +19.4% +15.9%
Price return edge GARP +215.4% +161.1%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 22.3% 22.2%
Max drawdown edge GARP (slight) −30.1% −32.5%
Downside capture 109.0% 100.1%
Beta 1.10 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GARP 0.78 0.65
Sortino edge GARP 1.16 0.97
Treynor 0.157 0.149
Calmar edge GARP 0.65 0.49
Against the benchmark
Alpha +3.4% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.15 −0.58
Information ratio 0.59 −0.11
Tracking error 7.9% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: GARP against PBUS, Jan 24, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; IWF against VONG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

GARP returned more: +232.4% to +172.2%. GARP and IWF swung about the same: 22.3% and 22.2%. GARP fell slightly less at its worst: −30.1% to −32.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GARP vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGARPIWFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+232.4%+172.2%GARPPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+19.4%+15.9%GARPTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+215.4%+161.1%GARPPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.3%22.2%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.9%14.8%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−30.1%−32.5%GARP (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture133.9%99.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture109.0%100.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.101.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.881.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.780.65GARPReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.160.97GARPReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1570.149Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.650.49GARPAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSVONGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+3.4% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.15−0.58Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +9.2%−0.6% to +0.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.59−0.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.9%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 352 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

55%

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and IWF hold 55% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

55% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GARP IWF
MICROSOFT 5.67% 5.94%
APPLE 5.66% 8.18%
NVIDIA 5.18% 15.30%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.72% 3.36%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 4.61% 3.15%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.24% 5.62%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.12% 4.53%
VISA CLASS A 5.13% 2.05%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.01% 2.74%
ELI LILLY 1.78% 3.08%
BROADCOM INC 1.70% 4.79%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 2.86% 1.33%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GARP
MERCADOLIBRE 1.86%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.81%
FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 0.49%
COEUR MINING 0.36%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.33%
WELLTOWER 0.28%
FLUTTER ENTERTAINMENT PLC 0.26%
NEWMONT 0.21%
Only in IWF
TESLA INC 3.58%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 0.85%
HOME DEPOT 0.71%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.58%
SANDISK 0.57%
AMGEN INC 0.52%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL 0.47%
LOCKHEED MARTIN 0.38%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Tracks the Russell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year +18.0% +0.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +1.1% (VONG)
Gap to its benchmark +4.7 pts vs PBUS −0.2 pts vs VONG
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 94.4% 93.5%
Holdings 131 374
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.6bn $124.7bn

GARP and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-B31F1A58B1

GARP and IWF are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. GARP follows MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index and IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 GARP returned +18.0% and IWF +0.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 17.1 points.
  3. Size. GARP has $3.6bn in net assets and IWF $124.7bn (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); IWF is 34.6 times larger.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GARP and IWF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GARP

GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.5%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or IWF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +18.0% and IWF +0.9%.
Which is cheaper, GARP or IWF?
GARP is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GARP against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/garp-vs-iwf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.