Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FYX vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FYX returned +26.2% to IWM's +14.1%; 33% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FYX and IWM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.4bn for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund and $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+26.2%
FYX total return, 1 year
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
0.58%
FYX expense ratio
0.19%
IWM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWM costs 0.39 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.1 points; IWM is far larger, $75.5bn against $1.4bn.

FYX vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFYXIWM
Return
Total return, 1 year+26.2%+14.1%
Drawdown
Below its high5.0%, high on Aug 4, 20267.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.58%0.19%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$1.4bn$75.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common33%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.9%3.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,014 weekly returns
FYX IWM
Return
Total return edge FYX +445.9% +338.2%
Annualized edge FYX +9.1% +7.9%
Price return edge FYX +363.4% +237.4%
Risk
Volatility edge IWM (slight) 24.6% 23.4%
Max drawdown edge IWM (slight) −60.9% −57.7%
Downside capture 110.3% 100.5%
Beta 1.19 1.01
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FYX (slight) 0.41 0.38
Sortino edge FYX 0.60 0.54
Treynor 0.086 0.106
Calmar edge FYX (slight) 0.15 0.14
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.6% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.62 −0.36
Information ratio 0.02 −0.02
Tracking error 12.0% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: FYX against IWV, May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026; IWM against VTWO, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FYX returned more: +445.9% to +338.2%. IWM swung slightly less: 23.4% to 24.6%. IWM fell slightly less at its worst: −57.7% to −60.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FYX vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFYXIWMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+445.9%+338.2%FYXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.1%+7.9%FYXTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+363.4%+237.4%FYXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.6%23.4%IWM (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation17.0%16.4%IWM (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−60.9%−57.7%IWM (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture122.6%101.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture110.3%100.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.191.01Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.781.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.38FYX (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.600.54FYXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0860.106Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.150.14FYX (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVVTWOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.6% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.62−0.36Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.7% to +3.5%−0.6% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.02−0.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error12.0%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,014 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

33%

By the books each fund has filed, FYX and IWM hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

33% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FYX IWM
GRAIL, Inc. 0.26% 0.21%
Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. 0.24% 0.19%
Tenable Holdings, Inc. 0.33% 0.18%
Option Care Health, Inc. 0.17% 0.17%
RXO, Inc. 0.26% 0.16%
Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation 0.29% 0.15%
Braze, Inc. (Class A) 0.33% 0.15%
Heartflow, Inc. 0.36% 0.15%
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. 0.21% 0.15%
Q2 Holdings, Inc. 0.15% 0.15%
Signet Jewelers Limited 0.28% 0.15%
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. 0.20% 0.15%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FYX
Mattel, Inc. 0.37%
Post Holdings, Inc. 0.33%
Assured Guaranty Ltd. 0.32%
Thor Industries, Inc. 0.31%
Seaboard Corporation 0.30%
Array Digital Infrastructure Inc 0.29%
Graphic Packaging Holding Company 0.29%
Netskope, Inc. (Class A) 0.28%
Only in IWM
JFROG 0.37%
GLAUKOS 0.35%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%
UMB FINANCIAL 0.33%
SM ENERGY 0.32%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +26.2% +14.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +14.3% (VTWO)
Gap to its benchmark +12.9 pts vs IWV −0.2 pts vs VTWO
Expense ratio 0.58% 0.19%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 525 1977
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.4bn $75.5bn

FYX and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-788A151B53

FYX and IWM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FYX follows Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index and IWM follows Russell 2000 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 33% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FYX returned +26.2% and IWM +14.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FYX and IWM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FYX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

FYX tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.58% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 525 positions, with the top ten at 3.9%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FYX or IWM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FYX returned +26.2% and IWM +14.1%.
Which is cheaper, FYX or IWM?
IWM is cheaper, by 0.39 percentage points a year. That is about $39 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FYX and IWM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FYX and 0% of IWM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FYX against IWM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fyx-vs-iwm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.