FXO vs IJJ: how they differ
FXO and IJJ hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and IJJ returned +10.5% over the year. First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund and iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF.
IJJ costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.6 points; IJJ is 8.1 times larger.
| FXO | IJJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.18% |
| Net assets | $1.0bn | $8.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.9% | +10.5% |
| Holdings in common | 14% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 17.1% | 11.0% |
| Below its high | 7.1%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | 7.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FXO and IJJ hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
14% in common
On the same fields
FXO and IJJ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FXO in plain words
FXO tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 41% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
IJJ in plain words
IJJ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 303 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FXO or IJJ?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXO returned +7.9% and IJJ +10.5%.
- Which is cheaper, FXO or IJJ?
- IJJ is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $42. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, FXO against IJJ, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxo-vs-ijj
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FXO against IJJ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxo-vs-ijj
[FXO against IJJ (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxo-vs-ijj)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.