Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FTEC vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTEC returned +25.0% to IWB's +13.1%; 36% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTEC and IWB

Net assets: $22.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF, and $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.

At a glance
+25.0%
FTEC total return, 1 year
+13.1%
IWB total return, 1 year
0.08%
FTEC expense ratio
0.15%
IWB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FTEC costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.9 points; IWB is 2.2 times larger.

FTEC vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECIWB
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.0%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexRussell 1000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.15%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$22.1bn$48.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common36%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund62.2%35.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 677 weekly returns
FTEC IWB
Return
Total return edge FTEC +1,178.5% +417.5%
Annualized edge FTEC +21.6% +13.5%
Price return edge FTEC +1,031.1% +321.5%
Risk
Volatility edge IWB 21.3% 16.4%
Max drawdown edge IWB (slight) −34.1% −32.7%
Downside capture 100.0% 100.1%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTEC 0.94 0.73
Sortino edge FTEC 1.41 1.06
Treynor 0.199 0.130
Calmar edge FTEC 0.63 0.41
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 −0.09
Information ratio −0.19 −0.03
Tracking error 0.7% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: FTEC against VGT, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; IWB against VONE, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FTEC returned more: +1,178.5% to +417.5%. IWB swung less: 16.4% to 21.3%. IWB fell slightly less at its worst: −32.7% to −34.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTEC vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECIWBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,178.5%+417.5%FTECPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+21.6%+13.5%FTECTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,031.1%+321.5%FTECPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.3%16.4%IWBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.1%11.4%IWBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−34.1%−32.7%IWB (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.7%100.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%100.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.940.73FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.411.06FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1990.130Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.630.41FTECAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVGTVONEThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.70−0.09Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.5% to +0.2%−0.5% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.19−0.03Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 677 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

36%

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and IWB hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

36% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTEC IWB
NVIDIA Corp 17.09% 7.15%
Apple Inc 16.21% 7.06%
Microsoft Corp 10.93% 5.56%
Broadcom Inc 4.20% 2.24%
Micron Technology Inc 3.82% 1.47%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.18% 1.28%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.92% 0.62%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.13% 0.62%
Intel Corp 1.65% 0.60%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.17% 0.46%
Lam Research Corp 1.54% 0.42%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.83% 0.38%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTEC
Applied Materials Inc 1.69%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.07%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.82%
TE Connectivity PLC 0.30%
NXP Semiconductors NV 0.28%
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp 0.16%
CDW Corp 0.13%
Hut 8 Corp 0.10%
Only in IWB
AMAZON.COM INC 3.46%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.63%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.12%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.92%
TESLA INC 1.68%
ELI LILLY 1.44%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.42%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Information Technology Tracks the Russell 1000
Total return, 1 year +25.0% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +24.7% (VGT) +13.2% (VONE)
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs VGT −0.1 pts vs VONE
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 91.7%
Holdings 281 1025
Net assets, FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 and IWB as of Oct 28, 2026 $22.1bn $49.1bn

FTEC and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-BE9CA5F723

FTEC and IWB do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FTEC follows MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index and IWB follows Russell 1000 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 36% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FTEC returned +25.0% and IWB +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTEC

FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or IWB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +25.0% and IWB +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or IWB?
FTEC is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FTEC and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTEC against IWB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftec-vs-iwb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.