Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FTCS vs RWK: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTCS returned +9.5% to RWK's +15.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FTCS and RWK
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.8bn for First Trust Capital Strength ETF and $1.3bn for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF.
Pair scorecard
RWK costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points; FTCS is 6.0 times larger.
| Measure | FTCS | RWK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +9.5% | +15.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.4%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Capital Strength Index | S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.53% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $7.8bn | $1.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | 20.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Feb 29, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 973 weekly returnsRWK returned more: +590.3% to +483.9%. FTCS swung less: 18.3% to 23.9%. FTCS fell less at its worst: −49.9% to −56.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FTCS | RWK | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +483.9% | +590.3% | RWK | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +9.9% | +10.9% | RWK (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +343.5% | +450.3% | RWK | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 18.3% | 23.9% | FTCS | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.9% | 16.7% | FTCS | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −49.9% | −56.2% | FTCS | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.53 | 0.49 | FTCS (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.75 | 0.70 | FTCS (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.20 | 0.19 | FTCS (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 973 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FTCS and RWK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FTCS and RWK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTCS and RWK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FTCS follows Capital Strength Index and RWK follows S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FTCS returned +9.5% and RWK +15.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FTCS
FTCS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.53% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
RWK
RWK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 399 positions, with the top ten at 20.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTCS or RWK?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTCS returned +9.5% and RWK +15.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FTCS or RWK?
- RWK is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FTCS against RWK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftcs-vs-rwk
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FTCS against RWK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftcs-vs-rwk
[FTCS against RWK (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftcs-vs-rwk)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.