Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FTA vs RSP: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTA returned +24.2% to RSP's +16.0%; 33% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FTA and RSPNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.4bn for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund and $99.8bn for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.
Pair scorecard
RSP costs 0.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points; RSP is far larger, $99.8bn against $1.4bn.
| Measure | FTA | RSP |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.2% | +16.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index | S&P 500 Equal Weight Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.4bn | $99.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 33% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 9.8% | 2.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,014 weekly returnsRSP returned more: +474.1% to +392.0%. RSP swung slightly less: 19.9% to 21.6%. RSP fell slightly less at its worst: −59.6% to −62.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FTA | RSP | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +392.0% | +474.1% | RSP | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +8.5% | +9.4% | RSP (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +238.9% | +317.5% | RSP | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 21.6% | 19.9% | RSP (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 15.3% | 14.1% | RSP (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −62.3% | −59.6% | RSP (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.42 | 0.47 | RSP | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.59 | 0.67 | RSP | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.14 | 0.16 | RSP | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,014 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FTA and RSP hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
33% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FTA and RSP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTA and RSP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FTA follows Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index and RSP follows S&P 500 Equal Weight Index.
- Holdings in common. 33% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FTA returned +24.2% and RSP +16.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FTA
FTA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.58% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 9.8%.
RSP
RSP tracks the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 508 positions, with the top ten at 2.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTA or RSP?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTA returned +24.2% and RSP +16.0%.
- Which is cheaper, FTA or RSP?
- RSP is cheaper, by 0.38 percentage points a year. That is about $38 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FTA against RSP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fta-vs-rsp
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FTA against RSP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fta-vs-rsp
[FTA against RSP (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fta-vs-rsp)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.