Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNX vs IJT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNX returned +12.4% to IJT's +15.4%; 17% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNX and IJT

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.4bn for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund and $7.5bn for iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+12.4%
FNX total return, 1 year
+15.4%
IJT total return, 1 year
0.62%
FNX expense ratio
0.18%
IJT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJT costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.0 points; IJT is 5.4 times larger.

FNX vs IJT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNXIJT
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+15.4%
Drawdown
Below its high4.9%, high on Aug 14, 20268.2%, high on Aug 4, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core IndexS&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.62%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$1.4bn$7.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common17%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund4.4%9.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,014 weekly returns
FNX IJT
Return
Total return edge Tie +455.7% +450.1%
Annualized edge Tie +9.2% +9.1%
Price return edge Tie +360.2% +362.5%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 22.8% 22.4%
Max drawdown edge Tie −57.0% −56.7%
Downside capture 107.9% 95.0%
Beta 1.15 0.91
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.43 0.43
Sortino edge IJT (slight) 0.61 0.63
Treynor 0.086 0.105
Calmar edge Tie 0.16 0.16
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.5% a year +2.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.77 1.64
Information ratio −0.01 0.19
Tracking error 9.1% 6.6%

Each against its own benchmark: FNX against IWV, May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026; IJT against SLYG, Oct 13, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FNX and IJT returned about the same: +455.7% and +450.1%. FNX and IJT swung about the same: 22.8% and 22.4%. FNX and IJT fell about the same at their worst: −57.0% and −56.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNX vs IJT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNXIJTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+455.7%+450.1%TiePrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.2%+9.1%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+360.2%+362.5%TiePrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.8%22.4%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.2%15.5%IJT (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−57.0%−56.7%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture115.8%90.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture107.9%95.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.150.91Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.850.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.430.43TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.610.63IJT (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0860.105Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.160.16TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVSLYGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.5% a year+2.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.771.64Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−5.4% to +2.4%−0.4% to +4.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.010.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.1%6.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,014 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

17%

By the books each fund has filed, FNX and IJT hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

17% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNX IJT
Urban Outfitters, Inc. 0.42% 0.63%
RingCentral, Inc. (Class A) 0.41% 0.45%
Lyft, Inc. (Class A) 0.40% 0.77%
Glaukos Corporation 0.39% 0.90%
Box, Inc. (Class A) 0.36% 0.47%
International Seaways, Inc. 0.36% 0.56%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. 0.36% 1.11%
TG Therapeutics, Inc. 0.36% 0.97%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 0.36% 0.43%
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. 0.35% 0.49%
Mercury General Corporation 0.37% 0.33%
Frontdoor, Inc. 0.33% 0.71%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNX
Range Resources Corporation 0.54%
Antero Resources Corporation 0.45%
APA Corporation 0.44%
CNX Resources Corporation 0.44%
EPAM Systems, Inc. 0.44%
Amentum Holdings, Inc. 0.43%
Genpact Limited 0.43%
Qualys, Inc. 0.43%
Only in IJT
CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS CLASS A 0.71%
ARCHROCK 0.68%
PTC THERAPEUTICS 0.63%
KODIAK GAS SERVICES INC 0.58%
ARGAN 0.58%
KARMAN HOLDINGS INC 0.57%
POWELL INDUSTRIES INC 0.56%
BADGER METER 0.54%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth
Total return, 1 year +12.4% +15.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +15.6% (SLYG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.9 pts vs IWV −0.2 pts vs SLYG
Expense ratio 0.62% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 8.2% 0.0%
Holdings 451 369
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.4bn $7.5bn

FNX and IJT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-20B33F93A6

FNX and IJT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FNX follows Nasdaq AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index and IJT follows S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 17% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNX returned +12.4% and IJT +15.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FNX and IJT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

FNX tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.62% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 451 positions, with the top ten at 4.4%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IJT

IJT tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.4% with distributions reinvested, against +15.6% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 369 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 8.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNX or IJT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNX returned +12.4% and IJT +15.4%.
Which is cheaper, FNX or IJT?
IJT is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNX and IJT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 8% of FNX and 0% of IJT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNX against IJT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnx-vs-ijt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.