Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to SCHP's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and SCHP

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $16.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
−0.8%
SCHP total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.03%
SCHP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHP costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.7 points.

FNDX vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXSCHP
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%−0.8%
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyUS TIPS
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.03%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026$27.6bn$16.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight88%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX SCHP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
Apple Inc 4.46%
Microsoft Corp 2.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80%
Alphabet Inc 1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
Only in SCHP
United States Treasury 4.07%
United States Treasury 4.01%
United States Treasury 4.00%
United States Treasury 3.77%
United States Treasury 3.60%
United States Treasury 3.40%
United States Treasury 3.38%
United States Treasury 3.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Schwab Schwab
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks an index of US TIPS
Total return, 1 year +23.9% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB +0.6 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.03%
Holdings 731 48
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026 $27.6bn $16.5bn

FNDX and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

SCHP

SCHP tracks an index of US TIPS. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or SCHP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and SCHP −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or SCHP?
SCHP is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against SCHP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-schp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.