Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs IJS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to IJS's +19.3%; 2% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and IJS

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $7.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
+19.3%
IJS total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.18%
IJS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJS costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.6 points.

FNDX vs IJS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXIJS
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%+19.3%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyS&P SmallCap 600 Value Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.18%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and IJS as of Oct 27, 2026$27.6bn$7.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common2%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%8.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 687 weekly returns
FNDX IJS
Return
Total return edge FNDX +418.7% +224.9%
Annualized edge FNDX +13.3% +9.3%
Price return edge FNDX +298.9% +164.8%
Risk
Volatility edge FNDX 15.9% 22.0%
Max drawdown edge FNDX −35.2% −46.2%
Downside capture 92.1% 100.4%
Beta 0.93 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FNDX 0.74 0.43
Sortino edge FNDX 1.05 0.63
Treynor 0.128 0.102
Calmar edge FNDX 0.38 0.20
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.4% a year −0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.28 −0.58
Information ratio −0.10 −0.14
Tracking error 5.3% 5.1%

Each against its own benchmark: FNDX against IWB, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; IJS against SLYV, Oct 13, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FNDX returned more: +418.7% to +224.9%. FNDX swung less: 15.9% to 22.0%. FNDX fell less at its worst: −35.2% to −46.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNDX vs IJS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXIJSEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+418.7%+224.9%FNDXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.3%+9.3%FNDXTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+298.9%+164.8%FNDXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility15.9%22.0%FNDXSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.2%15.0%FNDXLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.2%−46.2%FNDXDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture86.4%98.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture92.1%100.4%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.930.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.900.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.740.43FNDXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.050.63FNDXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1280.102Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.380.20FNDXAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBSLYVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.4% a year−0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.28−0.58Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +3.2%−2.5% to +1.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.10−0.14Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.3%5.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 687 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

2%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and IJS hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

2% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX IJS
Lumen Technologies Inc 0.10% 0.26%
CarMax Inc 0.07% 0.82%
Builders FirstSource Inc 0.06% 0.66%
Conagra Brands Inc 0.06% 0.73%
Eastman Chemical Co 0.06% 0.81%
SM Energy Co 0.06% 1.00%
Robert Half Inc 0.06% 0.46%
Mohawk Industries Inc 0.05% 0.68%
Organon & Co 0.05% 0.39%
World Kinect Corp 0.05% 0.20%
Caesars Entertainment Inc 0.05% 0.63%
LKQ Corp 0.05% 0.47%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
Apple Inc 4.46%
Microsoft Corp 2.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80%
Alphabet Inc 1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
Only in IJS
PAYCOM SOFTWARE 1.09%
MATCH GROUP INC 1.08%
VICTORIA S SECRET 0.79%
MOLSON COORS BREWING CLASS B 0.68%
MAGNOLIA OIL GAS CORP CLASS A 0.67%
ATLANTIC UNION BANKSHARES 0.61%
TRADE DESK CLASS A 0.58%
RXO INC 0.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value
Total return, 1 year +23.9% +19.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +19.2% (SLYV)
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB +0.1 pts vs SLYV
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 88.4% 0.0%
Holdings 731 477
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and IJS as of Oct 27, 2026 $27.6bn $7.7bn

FNDX and IJS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-7E393824FA

FNDX and IJS do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and IJS follows S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 2% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and IJS +19.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IJS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

IJS

IJS tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +19.2% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 477 positions, with the top ten at 8.8%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or IJS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and IJS +19.3%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or IJS?
IJS is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and IJS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FNDX and 0% of IJS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against IJS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-ijs

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.