Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs HYMB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to HYMB's −1.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and HYMB
Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $3.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
FNDX costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.9 points.
| Measure | FNDX | HYMB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | −1.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.7%, high on Jul 2, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | ICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and HYMB as of Oct 27, 2026 | $27.6bn | $3.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 88% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and HYMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and HYMB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
HYMB
HYMB tracks an index of Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jul 2, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or HYMB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and HYMB −1.0%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or HYMB?
- FNDX is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against HYMB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-hymb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against HYMB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-hymb
[FNDX against HYMB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-hymb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.