Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs HGER: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to HGER's +46.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and HGER

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $5.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
+46.9%
HGER total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.68%
HGER expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FNDX costs 0.43 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.0 points.

FNDX vs HGER: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXHGER
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%+46.9%
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyQuantix Commodity Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.68%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 28, 2026$27.6bn$5.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and HGER hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX HGER
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
Apple Inc 4.46%
Microsoft Corp 2.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80%
Alphabet Inc 1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
Only in HGER
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer Schwab Harbor
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy
Total return, 1 year +23.9% +46.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB not measured
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.68%
Already in the S&P 500 88.4% 0.0%
Holdings 731 0
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 28, 2026 $27.6bn $5.0bn

FNDX and HGER on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HGER flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

HGER

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or HGER?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and HGER +46.9%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or HGER?
FNDX is cheaper, by 0.43 percentage points a year. That is about $43 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and HGER overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FNDX and 0% of HGER by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against HGER, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-hger

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.