Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDA vs VB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDA returned +16.4% to VB's +14.4%; 36% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDA and VB
Net assets: $9.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF, and $76.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
VB costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.0 points.
| Measure | FNDA | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.4% | +14.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.3%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 5.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | Morningstar US Small Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, FNDA as of Aug 31, 2026 and VB as of Sep 30, 2026 | $9.1bn | $76.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 36% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 3.8% | 5.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 687 weekly returnsVB returned slightly more: +252.6% to +244.6%. VB swung slightly less: 19.8% to 20.7%. VB fell slightly less at its worst: −40.0% to −43.0%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FNDA | VB | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +244.6% | +252.6% | VB (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +9.8% | +10.0% | Tie | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +188.8% | +189.1% | Tie | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 20.7% | 19.8% | VB (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.4% | 13.8% | VB (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −43.0% | −40.0% | VB (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.46 | 0.48 | VB (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.67 | 0.69 | VB (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.23 | 0.25 | VB (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 687 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDA and VB hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
36% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDA and VB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDA and VB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 36% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDA returned +16.4% and VB +14.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.0 points.
- Cost. FNDA charges 0.25% of assets a year and VB 0.03%, a gap of 0.22 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FNDA
FNDA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 913 positions, with the top ten at 3.8%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VB
VB tracks an index of Small-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,303 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDA or VB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDA returned +16.4% and VB +14.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDA or VB?
- VB is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDA against VB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnda-vs-vb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDA against VB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnda-vs-vb
[FNDA against VB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnda-vs-vb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.