Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FLKR vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FLKR returned +79.7% to SPMO's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FLKR and SPMO

Net assets: $1.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF, and $22.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
FLKR total return, 1 year
+18.4%
SPMO total return, 1 year
0.09%
FLKR expense ratio
0.13%
SPMO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FLKR costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 61.3 points; SPMO is 12.9 times larger.

FLKR vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFLKRSPMO
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high24.1%, high on Jun 22, 202610.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE South Korea RIC Capped IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.13%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$1.7bn$21.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund64.6%50.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 17, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 466 weekly returns
FLKR SPMO
Return
Total return edge SPMO +144.1% +362.5%
Annualized edge SPMO +10.5% +18.6%
Price return edge SPMO +92.4% +317.4%
Risk
Volatility edge SPMO 29.4% 20.5%
Max drawdown edge SPMO −50.1% −28.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPMO 0.39 0.81
Sortino edge SPMO 0.58 1.20
Calmar edge SPMO 0.21 0.66
Reading

SPMO returned more: +362.5% to +144.1%. SPMO swung less: 20.5% to 29.4%. SPMO fell less at its worst: −28.3% to −50.1%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FLKR vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFLKRSPMOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+144.1%+362.5%SPMOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.5%+18.6%SPMOTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+92.4%+317.4%SPMOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility29.4%20.5%SPMOSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation20.0%13.7%SPMOLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−50.1%−28.3%SPMODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.390.81SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.581.20SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.210.66SPMOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 466 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FLKR and SPMO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FLKR SPMO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FLKR
SK HYNIX INC 27.39%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 18.00%
SK SQUARE CO LTD 4.30%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 4.17%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.46%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 2.01%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.99%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP COMPANY LTD 1.50%
Only in SPMO
Apple Inc 9.95%
Micron Technology Inc 8.80%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.48%
Johnson & Johnson 4.86%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%
Intel Corp 4.60%
Alphabet Inc 3.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 3.57%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the FTSE South Korea Tracks the S&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +4.7 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.13%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 100.0%
Holdings 156 101
Net assets, FLKR as of Oct 28, 2026 and SPMO as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.9bn $22.3bn

FLKR and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

SPMO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FLKR

FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPMO

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.7%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or SPMO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +79.7% and SPMO +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, FLKR or SPMO?
FLKR is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FLKR and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FLKR and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLKR against SPMO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-spmo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.